HomeMind Graph
Get startedMind Graph reads your help articles, blog posts, help flows, releases, requests and roadmap items, and comes back with a node for every capability you ship, wired to the ones it relates to. The competitor comparison grades against it, and the whole map is exposed over MCP.
Book a demo →Builds itself
Read out of your help articles, blog posts, flows, releases and requests.
One node per capability
Grouped by category, wired to whatever it relates to.
Shipped vs requested
Capabilities you ship counted apart from ones people only asked for.
Built, not drawn
The graph assembles itself out of what you have already written — the help articles, the blog posts, the help flows — and comes back with a node for every capability it can find in them, counted and categorised. Rebuild it when the product has moved on and it redraws itself.
Wired
Nodes are joined by the relationships between them, so the features everything else depends on show up as the hubs they are — and the ones nothing points at are just as informative. Pan and zoom around it; it is a map to read rather than a diagram to maintain.
Grouped
Core, integration, admin, automation, observability, customization, billing, security. Each one is drawn as its own cluster on the canvas with a count and a line saying what belongs in it, so a hundred nodes reads as eight groups rather than as a hairball.
What it feeds
A map of your own product is mildly interesting on its own. What makes it worth building is what reads it: the competitor comparison grades rivals against your capabilities, blog suggestions draw on what you have not covered, and the projection is available to your own tooling get filed against the capability they are actually about, and recommendations know what relates to what.
Who uses it
For product managers
Most teams cannot produce a list of everything their product does on request. This one comes out of your own documentation, so it is what you told customers you built rather than what the backlog claims.
For support leads
Derived from your own documentation rather than the backlog, so it reflects what you told customers you built.
For whoever triages
Capabilities that only ever appear in requests and roadmap items are flagged as gaps, so what people keep asking for is visible beside what you ship.
Connected
Every module writes to the same customer graph, so data captured here shows up wherever it is useful — no connectors to authorize, no sync to babysit.
See all integrations →AppGram modules
FAQ
Your own content. It reads help articles, blog posts, help flows, decision nodes, releases, feature requests and roadmap items, derives a capability for each thing, and wires the related ones together. The page tells you how many sources went into the build.
No, and that is rather the point — it is read-only. There is nothing to lay out and nothing to keep tidy. You rebuild it when the product has moved on and it redraws itself from whatever your documentation says now.
Core, integration, admin, automation, observability, customization, billing and security. Each is drawn as its own cluster on the canvas with a count and a line describing what belongs in it, and you can filter the map to one of them or search across all of them by name.
Three things today. The competitor comparison grades every rival against your capability map rather than against a guess. Blog topic suggestions are drawn from subjects the graph shows you have not written about. And a compact projection of the whole graph is exposed over REST and MCP, so your own tooling can read it too.
Yes. Every run is kept, and each one carries how long it took and what it did to the graph — nodes added, nodes removed.
Get started
Everything you were bolting together — feedback, roadmap, changelog, help, support, status, forms — in a single workspace with one API and one bill.
Cancel anytime. Yours to test on real customers.
