HomeCompetitor Intelligence
Get startedTracked queries watch what people say about a competitor, which keywords they hold, and how their pages change. Their capabilities are graded against your own product graph, so the comparison stays honest as both products move.
Book a demo →Private beta
Rolling out to organizations one at a time — request access to get on the list.
Five pillars
Mentions, positioning, ads, SEO and reviews, tracked per competitor.
Ask it directly
A plain question, answered from the rows actually gathered.
Listen
Tracked queries run against Reddit, Hacker News and web search on a schedule, and what comes back is scored and grouped. Not another feed to read every morning — a sentiment split, a daily volume and the topics people keep returning to, so the shape of an opinion is visible without reading four hundred posts.
Rank
One tracked query per keyword, checked over time, with the position held and the page holding it. The change since the last check says whether it is drifting. The interesting rows are the ones you would expect to own and do not.
Compare
Each competitor is scored against your own capability graph — the one Mind Graph derives from your documentation — so the comparison is anchored to what you actually ship rather than to a table somebody built once and never revisited. Anything they have that your graph has no node for is surfaced separately, as a gap worth naming.
Ask
A question in plain language, answered from the mentions, positioning diffs, ads, rankings and reviews already collected — rather than from whatever a model happens to remember about your market. Useful for the questions a dashboard cannot have a widget for.
Who uses it
For founders
The complaint somebody posts publicly about a rival is the feature request nobody ever filed with you. Filtering the mentions down to the negative ones is the quickest read on where a competitor is actually weak.
For product
Their capabilities graded against the graph of what you ship, so the table stays honest as both products move — instead of going stale the week after somebody made it in a spreadsheet.
For marketing
Positioning snapshots diff a competitor’s landing pages and changelog over time, so a repositioning arrives as a described change rather than as something you notice six months late.
Connected
Every module writes to the same customer graph, so data captured here shows up wherever it is useful — no connectors to authorize, no sync to babysit.
See all integrations →AppGram modules
FAQ
Tracked queries you define, run on a schedule against Reddit, Hacker News, web search, search results and Trustpilot. Each competitor carries its own set, grouped by what they are for, and any one of them can be run by hand when you would rather not wait for the schedule.
Against your own capability graph — the same one Mind Graph derives from your documentation. Each competitor is graded row by row as covered, partial, missing or unknown, with a confidence on each, so the comparison is anchored to what you actually ship rather than to a table written once and never updated.
It says unknown rather than guessing, and tells you why — usually that it has not collected enough of their pages yet. A matrix full of unknowns is a prompt to let the positioning snapshots run, not a verdict on the competitor.
Snapshots of a competitor’s public pages over time, diffed against each other. When their landing page changes what it leads with, or their changelog gains a section, it arrives as a described change rather than as something somebody happens to notice later.
Yes. Ask Intelligence takes a question in plain language and answers from the mentions, positioning diffs, ads, rankings and reviews already collected — the landscape as actually gathered, rather than whatever a model remembers about the market.
Get started
Everything you were bolting together — feedback, roadmap, changelog, help, support, status, forms — in a single workspace with one API and one bill.
Cancel anytime. Yours to test on real customers.
